Comments for 3D Power Sparks

Comment on Flex 3 Tree - XML Object-Relational Underground by 3D Power Sparks - 3D Urban Modeling, Animator, and Code Monkey Starts Blog

3D Power Sparks - 3D Urban Modeling, Animator, and Code Monkey Starts Blog — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:37:13 +0000

[...] Also, it might be a community service, besides self-serving. One of the most viewed pages is the flex tree; but no comments so, it must be the “underground” theme. Also, I never followed up on [...]

Comment on We Need To Know More by harley

harley — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:33:12 +0000

Yes. thanks for putting these examples out there. I am working my way through it. I have been studying Action Script 3.0 Design Patterns.. and hope to have a functional understanding of the topic. When I saw PureMVC’s MooTools framework that was recently released, I wanted to get a better grasp of design patterns, I haven’t made it through most of your examples, but your work has helped already. Thank you for this.

Comment on We Need To Know More by Paul Feakins

Paul Feakins — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:25:13 +0000

Hey Harley, just saw this link to my Flex page in my server logs - really glad my design pattern examples are of use to people!

All the best,
Paul.

Comment on Arduino, GIS PINS, Post No. 2 by Christopher Alan Ear

Christopher Alan Ear — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:00:54 +0000

This is crazy! Revolutionary. Don’t know where to start- the implications of what you can come up with are very broad.

Comment on Away3D, your sisters’ not going to like this… by harley

harley — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:36:18 +0000

This is even better to know. Thanks Peter K for the clarification. I appreciate keeping the record straight.

Comment on Away3D, your sisters’ not going to like this… by Peter K

Peter K — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 04:31:30 +0000

Hi,

Just to clear the uninformed comment before, some guys of the “PV” team didn’t take the sources and make Away3d.

Away3D was originally modified from papervision3d by a non-papervision3d member. Since then it’s been reworked from the ground up, and is its own 3d engine now, not being a port or rewriting anymore.

Thanks!

Comment on Away3D, your sisters’ not going to like this… by harley

harley — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:07:20 +0000

leerrau:
thanks, your right. good to know

Comment on Away3D, your sisters’ not going to like this… by leerraum

leerraum — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:39:49 +0000

First there was PV3D, then some guys of the PV team took the sources, they where free, and started to build away3D.

Comment on Away3D, your sisters’ not going to like this… by harley

harley — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:49:15 +0000

Good comments. I would really like to know the general break down of 3D web app usage. Game Entertainment, Demonstration, Advertisement, Geo-Spatial (mapping), Inter-Spatial (facilities), Education might be a few of the general uses. Maybe I can hit a few of the user communities to pool a list of sites deploying 3d then break them down into some general categories.

Comment on Away3D, your sisters’ not going to like this… by ellery

ellery — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:10:49 +0000

99.9% of the 3D web apps don’t need the performance of a 60 Hz flight simulator, so it doesn’t make sense to focus on adding high perf support for 3D to browsers. I an ideal world, browsers would get the high perf support, and then layer the lightweight web interfaces on top of that, but the total effort would be a lot greater and would only increase the benefit to include the 0.1% demanding apps.

Almost makes me wish for the browser-centric OS trend to catch on. Almost.